Flash Drought in CMIP5 Models

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract ‘Flash drought’ (FD) describes the rapid onset of drought on sub-seasonal times scales. It is particular interest for agriculture as it can deplete soil moisture crop growth in just a few weeks. To better understand processes causing FD, we evaluate importance evaporative demand and precipitation by comparing three different indices that estimate this hazard using meteorological hydrological parameters from CMIP5 suite models. We apply Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI); Evaporative Demand Drought (EDDI), derived (E 0 ); Stress (ESI), which connects atmospheric conditions measuring ratio actual potential evaporation. The results show moderate-to-strong relationships (r 2 > 0.5) between upper level daily time scales, especially drought-prone regions. find all are able to identify FD top 10-cm layer similar proportion models’ climatologies. However, there significant inter-model spread characteristics FDs identified. This mainly caused an overestimation E , indicating stark differences land surface models coupling individual Of indices, SPI provides highest skill predicting prior or at moisture, while both EDDI ESI significantly lower skill. highlight lack main contributor climate models, with playing secondary role.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

ENSO Asymmetry in CMIP5 Models

The El Ni~ no–La Ni~ na asymmetry is evaluated in 14 coupled models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The results show that an underestimate of ENSO asymmetry, a common problem noted in CMIP3 models, remains a common problem in CMIP5 coupled models. The weaker ENSO asymmetry in the models primarily results from a weaker SST warm anomaly over the eastern Pacific ...

متن کامل

CMIP5 Earth System Models

Introduction Conclusions References Tables Figures Back Close Full Screen / Esc Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Tables Figures Back Close Full Screen / Esc Abstract Superimposed on the continued increase in the atmospheric CO 2 concentration is a prominent seasonal cycle. Ground-based and aircraft-based observation records show that the amplitude of this seasonal cycle has increase...

متن کامل

Evaluating the drought response of CMIP5 models using global gross primary productivity, leaf area, precipitation, and soil moisture data

Realistic representation of vegetation’s response to drought is important for understanding terrestrial carbon cycling. We evaluated nine Earth system models from the historical experiment of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 for the response of gross primary productivity (GPP) and leaf area index (LAI) to hydrological anomalies. Hydrological anomalies were characterized by the ...

متن کامل

Earth's energy imbalance since 1960 in observations and CMIP5 models

Observational analyses of running 5 year ocean heat content trends (Ht) and net downward top of atmosphere radiation (N) are significantly correlated (r ∼ 0.6) from 1960 to 1999, but a spike in Ht in the early 2000s is likely spurious since it is inconsistent with estimates of N from both satellite observations and climate model simulations. Variations in N between 1960 and 2000 were dominated ...

متن کامل

The two types of ENSO in CMIP5 models

[1] In this study, we evaluate the intensity of the CentralPacific (CP) and Eastern-Pacific (EP) types of El NiñoSouthern Oscillation (ENSO) simulated in the pre-industrial, historical, and the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) 4.5 experiments of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). Compared to the CMIP3 models, the pre-industrial simulations of the CMIP5 models ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Hydrometeorology

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['1525-7541', '1525-755X']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-20-0262.1